NAWL finds Judge Sotomayor "Highly Qualified"

Jul 16, 2009

NAWL finds Judge Sonia Sotomayor "Highly Qualified" for the position of Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. 

July 16, 2009 -- JoAnne A. Epps, NAWL Supreme Court Committee Co-Chair and Dean of Temple University Beasley School of Law, testified on behalf of NAWL at Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation hearing. Dean Epps was identified as a majority witness.

Read Dean Epps’ testimony>

Read NAWL's Letter to Senator Leahy Regarding Judge Sotomayor>



July 7, 2009 -- NAWL finds Judge Sonia Sotomayor "Highly Qualified" for the position of Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. 

The conclusion, based upon Judge Sotomayor’s intellectual capacity, her appropriate judicial temperament and her respect for established law and process, has been reported today to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Read the full statement>



May 5, 2009 - NAWL urges appointment of woman to Supreme Court. 

Read the full statement>


By Isabell Retamoza 26 Mar, 2024
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
By Isabell Retamoza 20 Mar, 2024
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
By Isabell Retamoza 20 Mar, 2024
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
By Isabell Retamoza 20 Mar, 2024
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
By Isabell Retamoza 20 Mar, 2024
On August 2, 2021, NAWL joined the National Women’s Law Center, along with our law firm partner Allen & Overy LLP, and 30+ organizations to file an amicus brief to the Eleventh Circuit in support of three transgender women who were denied accurate gender markers on their driver’s licenses by the state of Alabama. Alabama’s policy requires transgender people to undergo genital surgery and provide proof of such to the State before they are able to receive a driver’s license that accurately states their gender. As our amicus brief explains, such a restrictive policy unlawfully discriminates against transgender people in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. Carrying a license with an inaccurate gender marker also puts transgender people—especially Black and brown trans women—at a heightened risk of discrimination, harassment, and attack. The district court correctly decided that Alabama’s policy violates equal protection because it discriminates against transgender people on the basis of sex, and amici urge the Eleventh Circuit to affirm the lower court’s decision The plaintiffs are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund (TLDEF).
By Isabell Retamoza 18 Mar, 2024
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
More Posts
Share by: