NAWL finds Solicitor General Elena Kagan to be "Well Qualified"

Aug 12, 2010

NAWL finds Solicitor General Elena Kagan to be "Well Qualified" for the position of Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court.

August 12, 2010 -- NAWL provides commentary on the appointment of Supreme Court Associate Justice Elena Kagan.

Read the full commentary>



August 5, 2010 -- NAWL issues a statement regarding the appointment of Supreme Court Associate Justice Elena Kagan.

Read the full statement>



July 6, 2010 -- Patricia Lee Refo testifies on the Nomination of Solicitor General Elena Kagan as Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States.

Read the full testimony>



June 23, 2010 -- Based on an extensive review, the Committee is confident that General Kagan possesses the requisite intellectual and analytic talent, judicial temperament, and professional demeanor to serve on the highest court in the land. The NAWL Committee is equally confident that she will approach cases and controversies with a mind that is open to all perspectives and with an appreciation of the professional and societal difficulties encountered by women and minorities. For these reasons, the NAWL Committee concludes that General Kagan is "well-qualified" to serve as Associate Justice, which is the highest recommendation that the Committee is authorized to confer upon a nominee.

Read the full statement>



May 11, 2010 -- NAWL evaluates Nomination of Solicitor General Elena Kagan to Supreme Court. 

Read the full evaluation>


By Isabell Retamoza 26 Mar, 2024
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
By Isabell Retamoza 20 Mar, 2024
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
By Isabell Retamoza 20 Mar, 2024
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
By Isabell Retamoza 20 Mar, 2024
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
By Isabell Retamoza 20 Mar, 2024
On August 2, 2021, NAWL joined the National Women’s Law Center, along with our law firm partner Allen & Overy LLP, and 30+ organizations to file an amicus brief to the Eleventh Circuit in support of three transgender women who were denied accurate gender markers on their driver’s licenses by the state of Alabama. Alabama’s policy requires transgender people to undergo genital surgery and provide proof of such to the State before they are able to receive a driver’s license that accurately states their gender. As our amicus brief explains, such a restrictive policy unlawfully discriminates against transgender people in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. Carrying a license with an inaccurate gender marker also puts transgender people—especially Black and brown trans women—at a heightened risk of discrimination, harassment, and attack. The district court correctly decided that Alabama’s policy violates equal protection because it discriminates against transgender people on the basis of sex, and amici urge the Eleventh Circuit to affirm the lower court’s decision The plaintiffs are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund (TLDEF).
By Isabell Retamoza 18 Mar, 2024
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
More Posts
Share by: