NAWL Joins Second Letter to President Biden to Take Action on ERA

December 16, 2024

December 16, 2024



The Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr.

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20500


Re: An Urgent Call for Your Legacy


Dear President Biden:


This month marks 101 years since the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was first introduced in the US Congress. The ERA would constitutionally protect equality of rights under the law regardless of sex. While it has met all ratification requirements, the ERA remains to be added to the US Constitution.


Publication of the ERA is essential for the restoration of reproductive rights and health care in our country, the enforcement of existing federal anti-discrimination laws, and the health of our democracy. On behalf of the League of Women Voters (the League), Shattering Glass, and the 141 undersigned organizations, we urge you to, in your last months serving as President of this nation, direct US Archivist Shogan to fulfill her statutory duty and certify and publish the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution.


Despite the significant legal and legislative advances made in recent decades, women and other Americans continue to face discrimination on the basis of sex, fundamentally undermining a central tenet of our democracy: equality. Under the US Supreme Court’s current interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, sex discrimination claims are not subject to the same strict scrutiny standard as other protected classifications, such as race.


The ramifications of applying a lower standard of review, heightened scrutiny, to sex discrimination claims are clear, including limited access to comprehensive health care, domestic violence, unequal pay, workplace harassment, pregnancy discrimination, discrimination against LGBTQIA+ individuals, and more. And with United States v. Skrmetti currently before the US Supreme Court, there is real and substantial risk that protection based on gender and gender identity under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause may be severely weakened or eliminated altogether.1


Two and a half years ago, supporters of women’s, civil, and human rights watched in horror as the US Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade, overturning the federal constitutional right to abortion and stripping women and people who may become pregnant of a fundamental right they’d held for nearly 50 years. Today, abortion is entirely banned in 13 states — home to an estimated 17.8 million women of reproductive age — and banned before viability in another 11 states.2 Researchers estimate that a nationwide abortion ban could lead to a 24% increase in pregnancy-related deaths and a 39% increase in pregnancy-related deaths among Black women.3

Across our country, women who've survived a delay in vital care due to abortion bans have gut-wrenchingly recounted their stories, and journalists have reported the stories of women who’ve lost their lives. This politically manufactured crisis is unacceptable.


Under your leadership, the Administration has worked to defend and increase the accessibility of FDA-approved medication abortion, defend emergency medical care and interstate travel, strengthen health data privacy, and share accurate reproductive rights information. Together with Vice President Harris, you made reproductive freedoms a cornerstone of the Presidential campaigns. In light of the incoming administration, each of these advances is under imminent threat. The publication of the ERA in the Constitution will provide a vital tool in the continued fight to protect, restore, and advance reproductive rights and justice- one that cannot just be rolled back with a change in government composition.


In 2024, we saw the prospective impact of the ERA on reproductive rights. In January of this year, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that, under Pennsylvania’s ERA, which uses the same language as the federal ERA, abortion providers could challenge the state’s ban on Medicaid coverage for abortion as sex discrimination.4 In March, a Nevada trial court also ruled that this Medicaid coverage ban violated Nevada’s ERA and, in September, required the state’s Medicaid program to cover abortion care services.5 The Equal Rights Amendment could help protect and restore the right to abortion.


Your legacy protecting women’s rights stretches back to your Senate days as a champion and author of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), the decades you’ve spent implementing and strengthening this legislation, and your time as President taking actions to address gender-based violence (GBV). As you know well from your years of service, intimate partner violence and GBV continue to be endemic in the United States. More than 40% of women have experienced violence or stalking by an intimate partner in their lifetime.6


At the heart of VAWA was a provision for a civil remedy for victims of GBV to sue their attackers. When the US Supreme Court struck this down in 2000, it asserted that Congress lacked the constitutional authority to provide a civil remedy against perpetrators of gender-based violence under the Commerce Clause of Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.7 The Equal Rights Amendment would grant Congress the authority to pass laws addressing GBV.


You also know the vital role that equality plays in striving to build a more perfect democracy. In 2023, you co-hosted the historic second Summit for Democracy, culminating in a Declaration enumerating several international commitments, including equal protection of women’s rights under law.8


The past four Women’s Equality Days, your White House proclamation has spoken to enshrining the principle of gender equality in our Constitution. Mr. President, you have the power to make that happen.


In August, the American Bar Association (ABA), the largest voluntary association of lawyers globally, with the mission of defending liberty and pursuing justice, held its annual meeting. There, the ABA adopted a resolution recognizing the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment to the US Constitution and urged its implementation. In doing so, the ABA warned that, without the ERA, the US Supreme Court has indicated that Fourteenth Amendment sex-based equal protection is in “grave peril.”9


In October, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, in coordination with six medical societies, called on your Administration to do everything in your power to finalize the Equal Rights Amendment to help realize the right to reproductive health care.10


In November, the Reproductive Health Coalition, a wide range of health professional associations and reproductive justice and other allied organizations, led by the American Medical Women’s Association and Doctors for America, issued a statement urging you to direct publication of the Equal Rights Amendment to address the worsening healthcare crisis.11


Today, 78% of Americans favor adding the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution.12


We recognize the complexity of this issue. However, the continued punting of responsibility to formally recognize the only duly ratified constitutional amendment not to be added to the Constitution undermines the Constitution itself, the ratification rights of the states, the integrity of our democracy, and urgently, the liberties and lives of more than half of our population.


The undersigned organizations implore you to move beyond politics to take swift action on this urgent issue before our democracy is further eroded and more lives are lost. We deeply appreciate the leadership and consistent commitment you have shown for sex and gender equality throughout your lifetime of public service. As we carry that mantle at a pivotal time in our history, we fervently implore you to seize this historic opportunity and enshrine sex equality into our Constitution. This can be your legacy. The health, rights, and future of our democracy depend on it.


For questions, please reach out to Jessica Jones Capparell, director of government affairs at the League, (jjones@lwv.org), Rebecca Goldman, justice reform legislative and policy manager at the League (rgoldman@lwv.org), and Nicole Vorrasi Bates, executive director of Shattering Glass (nvbates@shatteringglass.org).


Sincerely,

League of Women Voters of the United States logo
Shattering Glass logo

National:

Advancement Project

All In Action Fund

American Association of University Women

American Constitution Society

American Humanist Association

American Medical Women’s Association

Bend the Arc: Jewish Action

By The Women For The Women Vote

Catholics for Choice

Center for American Progress

Center for Common Ground

The Christian Left

Clearinghouse on Women’s Issues

Combat Sexual Assault

DemCast USA

Democracy Labs

Democrats Abroad

Democrats for Change (DemocratsFor.US)

Doctors for America

Elizabeth Cady Stanton Trust

End Rape On Campus

EQUAL MEANS EQUAL

Equality Now

ERA Coalition

Faiths for Safe Water

Family Values @ Work Action

The Feminist Front

The Feminist Uprising

Feminists in Struggle

Few and Far Women

Free Speech For People

Funders’ Committee for Civic Participation (FCCP)

Generation Vote

Get Free

GLAAD

GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBTQ+ Equality

Green Alliance for Sex-Based Rights

Guttmacher Institute

Impact Fund

Indivisible

Jewish Council for Public Affairs

Jewish Women International

Justice and Joy National Collaborative

Labor Council for Latin American Advancement

Lawyers For Good Government

Legal Momentum, The Women’s Legal Defense and Education Fund

Medical Students for Choice

Military & Veterans Women’s Coalition

Modern Military Association of America

Moms First

MomsRising

Moral Injury Support Network for Servicewomen, Inc.

MoveOn

Muslims for Progressive Values

National Association of Women Lawyers

National Black Justice Collective

National Center for Lesbian Rights

National Coalition on Black Civic Participation/ Black Women’s Roundtable

National Consumers League

National Council of Jewish Women

National Council of Negro Women

National Disability Rights Network (NDRN)

National Education Association

National Federation of Business and Professional Women’s Clubs

National LGBTQ Task Force Action Fund

National Network for Arab American Communities

National Organization for Women

National Women’s Political Caucus

Nurses for America

Patient Care Heroes

People Power United

ProgessiveChristianity.org

The Restaurant Opportunities Centers United (ROC United)

Sexual Violence Prevention Association (SVPA)

SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change

Strike for America

Survivor Justice Action

Take Back Christianity

Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (TEACH)

Trans Empowerment Project

Trans Formations Project

UltraViolet Action

United Church of Christ

Vote For Your Daughter

VoteEquality

Voters of Tomorrow

Women in Medicine, Inc.

Women Lawyers On Guard Action Network, Inc.

The Workers Circle

The Young Feminist Party

Zetas in Action

Zonta USA Caucus


State/Local:

10000 Women Louisiana

Abortion Action Missouri

AccessMatters

Alice Paul Center for Gender Justice

American Medical Women’s Association Georgia Physicians

Appleton Area NOW (WI)

Arizona Center for Women’s Advancement

Between the Waters

Business and Professional Women Federation of North Carolina

The California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls

Cambridge Reproductive Health Consultants

Central Phoenix Inez Casiano NOW

ERA Minnesota

ERA Ohio

ERA Task Force Arizona

ERA-NC Alliance

Good Trouble WNC

Green Party of McKean County, PA

Indiana Women’s Action Movement

Indivisible Evanston

Indivisible Lincoln Square

Indivisible Marin

Indivisible Virginia

Medical Students for Choice – Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine Chapter

National Council of Jewish Women Arizona

National Organization For Women – New Jersey

Nevada NOW

Nevadans for the ERA

North Carolina National Organization for Women (NC NOW)

NOVA NCNW Section Social Justice Committee

NOW – Akron Ohio Chapter

Ohio Federation of Business and Professional Women

Ohio NOW

PA Religious Coalition for Reproductive Justice

Pittsburgh Pride Group

Pro-Choice North Carolina

Proud Haven

Reproductive Justice Maryland

Reynolds Family Foundation

Saratoga Caucus for Reproductive Rights

TransYOUniting

Wild West Access Fund of Nevada

Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault

Women Employed

Women’s Forum of North Carolina

Women’s Fund of Western Massachusetts

Women’s Health Specialists

Women’s Law Project

Women4Change Indiana


[cc: Vice President Kamala Harris]

1 | https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-477.html

2 | https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/dashboard/abortion-in-the-u-s-dashboard/; https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/

3 | https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/7g29k

4 | https://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/allegheny-reproductive-health-center-v-pa-department-of-human-services---26-map-2021

5 | https://statecourtreport.org/case-tracker/silver-state-hope-fund-v-nevada-department-health-and-human-services

6 | https://www.cdc.gov/intimate-partner-violence/about/index.html

7 | https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/99-5P.ZO

8 | https://www.state.gov/summit-for-democracy/; https://www.state.gov/declaration-of-the-summit-for-democracy-2023/

9 | https://www.americanbar.org/content/aba-cms-dotorg/en/news/reporter_resources/annual-meeting-2024/house-of-delegates-resolutions/601/

10 | https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2024/10/statement-on-the-equal-rights-amendment

11 | https://8fdaf192-a63f-4cc1-ba48-30c5727fb699.usrfiles.com/ugd/8fdaf1_1a647c98a98a4934b60ed7293f12f7ad.pdf

12 | https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/07/07/a-century-after-women-gained-the-right-to-vote-majority-of-americans-see-work-to-do-on-gender-equality/

June 30, 2025
Last week, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic , ruling 6–3 that individual Medicaid beneficiaries cannot sue state officials to enforce the “free-choice-of-provider” provision of the Medicaid Act. The Court’s decision could pave the way for states to exclude providers like Planned Parenthood from Medicaid programs, even when doing so limits access to essential reproductive and preventive health care -- and even when the sole basis for doing so is for ideological reasons. This ruling marks a significant setback for reproductive justice and health equity. By narrowing the ability of individuals to challenge state actions that restrict access to care, the Court has further eroded the legal tools available to protect the rights of patients who rely on Medicaid to access fundamental healthcare, including preventative and general care and access to contraception. Marginalized communities will likely be disparately affected. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a powerful dissent, emphasized the real-world consequences of the majority’s decision: “[T]oday’s decision is likely to result in tangible harm to real people. At a minimum, it will deprive Medicaid recipients in South Carolina of their only meaningful way of enforcing a right that Congress has expressly granted to them. And, more concretely, it will strip those South Carolinians—and countless other Medicaid recipients around the country—of a deeply personal freedom: the ‘ability to decide who treats us at our most vulnerable.’” NAWL is proud to have joined with the Women’s Bar Association of the District of Columbia in filing an amicus brief which underscored the importance of preserving legal avenues for patients to challenge discriminatory and harmful state policies. NAWL stands in solidarity with Planned Parenthood, reproductive rights advocates, and the millions of individuals whose access to care is now at greater risk. We urge our members and allies to continue advocating for a legal system that upholds the rights, health, and dignity of all people—regardless of income, identity, or geography. --- NAWL will continue the conversation at the 2025 Annual Meeting . Hear about this Supreme Court term’s major decisions affecting NAWL’s mission from Arabella Babb Mansfield Award Recipients and co-hosts of the Strict Scrutiny podcast: Leah Litman, Professor of Law at University of Michigan Law School; Melissa Murray, Professor of Law at New York University School of Law; and Kate Shaw, Professor of Law at University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. Additionally, after a workshop screening of the film Zurawski v Texas , Cici Coquillette from the Center for Reproductive Rights and Cassie Ehrenberg from The Lawyering Project and Abortion Defense Network will specifically discuss the Medina decision.
Trans flag waving against a blue sky.
June 24, 2025
Last week, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Skrmetti , which upholds a Tennessee law (SB1) banning gender-affirming medical care —such as puberty blockers and hormones— for transgender minors. In the 6–3 decision, the Court held that SB1 does not warrant heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause, despite its discriminatory targeting of transgender youth by explicitly permitting hormone treatments and gender-affirming care for youth who identify as cisgender, while denying the same care for youth who identify as trans. This ruling has the potential to reshape access to health care and marks a profound erosion of the Equal Protection clause as a tool for challenging laws that disproportionately affect women and other marginalized groups. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a searing dissent, laid bare the consequences of the Court’s refusal to confront the reality of this legislation: “[T]he majority refuses to call a spade a spade. Instead, it obfuscates a sex classification that is plain on the face of this statute, all to avoid the mere possibility that a different court could strike down SB1, or categorical healthcare bans like it. The Court's willingness to do so here does irrevocable damage to the Equal Protection Clause and invites legislatures to engage in discrimination by hiding blatant sex classifications in plain sight. It also authorizes, without second thought, untold harm to transgender children and the parents and families who love them. Because there is no constitutional justification for that result, I dissent.” As an organization committed to advancing gender equity under the law, NAWL stands with transgender individuals, families, advocates, and scholars who continue this long fight. The Court’s application of rational basis review to state laws targeting a specific “medical use” may also have far-reaching negative consequences on gender health equity more broadly, including access to reproductive care. NAWL calls on its members and allies to speak out, support impacted communities, and work toward a legal system rooted in dignity, equity, and justice for all. --- NAWL will continue the conversation at the 2025 Annual Meeting during the session, “ U.S. v. Skrmetti : The Future of Gender Equity in Healthcare,” featuring National Center for LGBTQ Rights Legal Director Shannon Minter and Executive Director of the Williams Institute Christy Mallory .
April 29, 2025
Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President
April 2, 2025
Medina v. Planned Parenthood of South Atlantic
More Posts